[rspec-devel] Translated Specs?

[David Chelimsky]

On 8/19/07, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/19/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/18/07, Brian Takita <brian.takita at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Can somebody explain what the translated specs are?
> >
> > Funny - that was added when we were preparing for 1.0 as a test for
> > the translator. The translator is still necessary, but the translated
> > specs are obsolete at this point (as there is nothing to actually
> > translate).
> >
> > Aslak - can you weigh in on this? Unless you think otherwise, I'd like
> > to kill that part of the pre_commit process.
> >
>
> The translator translates deprecated code (which we still have - the matchers).

Do you mean the mock argument constraints that are expressed as Symbols?

> As long as we keep deprecated code around and want a translator that
> can translate it we should keep this part of the build around. It
> verifies that translated code still passes.
>
> Aslak
>
> > > To me they look
> > > exactly the same as the regular example suite.
> > > Is the translated specs rake task dead code?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Brian
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rspec-devel mailing list
> > > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-devel mailing list
> > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>