[rspec-devel] merging rbehave into rspec
David Chelimsky
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Mon Aug 6 20:37:58 EDT 2007
On 8/6/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:
>
> What is the protocol for submitting patches? Should we be submitting
> them through RSpec's tracker?
Now that there is a branch, yes please. Please reference the branch in
the ticket, along w/ the revision number you are patching (as there
will likely be some activity in the next few days).
Thanks,
David
>
> Scott
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2007, at 6:58 PM, James Deville wrote:
>
> > Dan,
> >
> > In response to your question about specific files/behaviors, I will
> > be sending a patch this eventing that will expose the -e option
> > through rake spec:e. Hope it helps.
> >
> > Jim Deville
> >
> > On 8/6/07, Dan North <dan at tastapod.com> wrote:
> > Hi folks.
> >
> > The merge is a bit more involved than I thought, mostly due to my
> > poor understanding of rspec mocks, so I've created a branch at
> > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/rbehave-import if anyone
> > wants to monitor progress or get involved.
> >
> > Quick update: all classes and modules in the RBehave namespace have
> > been moved into Spec::Story verbatim (along with their examples of
> > course). This means that, for instance, there are currently two
> > PendingException classes - rbehave's and rspec's.
> >
> > I still have 2 examples failing (same problem in two places) that
> > seem to be about how I'm using rspec's mocking framework. If anyone
> > can spot the deliberate error I'd be very grateful. The line is:
> >
> > Runner.stub!(:dry_run).and_return(true)
> >
> > which is giving me the error:
> >
> > can't convert Spec::Story::Runner::Options into Hash
> >
> > Once these are working, the next step is to ensure the rcov
> > coverage is up to 100% and get the pre-commit rake target passing.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott Taylor wrote:
> >> On Aug 2, 2007, at 11:00 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 8/2/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:
> >>>> There seems to be quite a few of us who want to help. What is the
> >>>> state of this project? Is this being worked on in the Rbehave
> >>>> repos? Maybe the RSpec admins could create a branch in the rspec
> >>>> repos to facilitate this merging.
> >>> Thanks to all for your interest. I need to talk to Aslak and Dan
> >>> about
> >>> how we're going to do this, so please hang tight.
> >> Thanks David. I guess I'm still a little unsure whether the whole
> >> code base will be merged in to RSpec, or whether it will stay
> >> separate but the World modules will get mixed into RSpec somehow or
> >> another.
> >>
> >> I guess we will wait a few days to hear the news.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> David
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> rspec-devel mailing list
> >>> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/
> >>> rspec-devel
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rspec-devel mailing list
> >> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/
> >> rspec-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-devel mailing list
> > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-devel mailing list
> > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>
More information about the rspec-devel
mailing list