[rspec-devel] merging rbehave into rspec

[Scott Taylor]

What is the protocol for submitting patches?  Should we be submitting  
them through RSpec's tracker?

Scott


On Aug 6, 2007, at 6:58 PM, James Deville wrote:

> Dan,
>
> In response to your question about specific files/behaviors, I will  
> be sending a patch this eventing that will expose the -e option  
> through rake spec:e. Hope it helps.
>
> Jim Deville
>
> On 8/6/07, Dan North <dan at tastapod.com> wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> The merge is a bit more involved than I thought, mostly due to my  
> poor understanding of rspec mocks, so I've created a branch at  
> http://rspec.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/rbehave-import if anyone  
> wants to monitor progress or get involved.
>
> Quick update: all classes and modules in the RBehave namespace have  
> been moved into Spec::Story verbatim (along with their examples of  
> course). This means that, for instance, there are currently two  
> PendingException classes - rbehave's and rspec's.
>
> I still have 2 examples failing (same problem in two places) that  
> seem to be about how I'm using rspec's mocking framework. If anyone  
> can spot the deliberate error I'd be very grateful. The line is:
>
>     Runner.stub!(:dry_run).and_return(true)
>
> which is giving me the error:
>
>     can't convert Spec::Story::Runner::Options into Hash
>
> Once these are working, the next step is to ensure the rcov  
> coverage is up to 100% and get the pre-commit rake target passing.
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
>
>
> Scott Taylor wrote:
>> On Aug 2, 2007, at 11:00 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/2/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:
>>>> There seems to be quite a few of us who want to help. What is the
>>>> state of this project? Is this being worked on in the Rbehave
>>>> repos? Maybe the RSpec admins could create a branch in the rspec
>>>> repos to facilitate this merging.
>>> Thanks to all for your interest. I need to talk to Aslak and Dan  
>>> about
>>> how we're going to do this, so please hang tight.
>> Thanks David. I guess I'm still a little unsure whether the whole
>> code base will be merged in to RSpec, or whether it will stay
>> separate but the World modules will get mixed into RSpec somehow or
>> another.
>>
>> I guess we will wait a few days to hear the news.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rspec-devel mailing list
>>> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
>>> rspec-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-devel mailing list
>> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
>> rspec-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel