[rspec-devel] Removing context/specify: what will "it do" to spec names?
David Chelimsky
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Sat Apr 14 01:02:56 EDT 2007
On 4/13/07, Ian Dees <undees at gmail.com> wrote:
> Quoth Aslak:
>
> > Contexts are gone, and so are specify (ok, they are around a little bit longer for compatibility).
>
> context / specify are going to be deleted entirely? I thought they
> were just going to be preserved as an alternative to describe / it.
>
> I don't mind converting scripts, but what will this do to
> autogenerated spec names? For example:
>
> context "Foo"
> specify do
> @foo.bar.should == :baz
> end
> end
>
> would become:
>
> describe "Foo"
> it do
> @foo.bar.should == :baz
> end
> end
>
> "it do?" Doesn't feel right to me.
It don't?
Seriously - we'll probably keep specify around unless somebody comes
up w/ a better word that "it".
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>
More information about the rspec-devel
mailing list