[rspec-devel] rspec stubbing
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Thu Sep 28 08:02:29 EDT 2006
On 9/28/06, Luke Redpath <luke at agileevolved.com> wrote:
> +1 for waiting and branching.
> -1 for the partial mocking - I much prefer the stubbing
> functionality. I love using Stubba but thats currently broken with
> the latest RSpec release - I would be one very happy man if RSpec
> rolled in its own Stubba-like functionality. I'd have no objections
> to both though!
> As well as being able to stub a method to return a value, it would be
> nice to be able to stub a method with a routine as well:
> Foo.stub!(:bar) do
> # do something here!
I haven't looked at Brian's re-implementation yet (in branches/stubs),
but the first implementation did this already. Look for this as part
of the next-next release (0.6.5). Just some kinks to work out.
> On 27 Sep 2006, at 04:06, David Chelimsky wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > Brian contributed a patch with some kick-ass stubbing capability last
> > week. I've been playing w/ the syntax a bit, with an eye to making it
> > more rspec like:
> > Story.stub!(:new).with(value)
> > I was able to get this to work, but it wasn't exactly what I think we
> > need from rspec. I think what we really need is class level mocking -
> > just like the existing mocking framework:
> > Story.should_receive(:new).and_return(value)
> > Person.should_receive(:find).with("1").and_return(value)
> > etc.
> > Right now there are a ton of other features that we're waiting to
> > release until this gets settled. What I'd like to do is to yank the
> > stubbing from the trunk so we can release and then add it to a branch
> > in which we can play w/ syntax and functionality, moving towards
> > including it an 0.6.5 release.
> > That work for everyone?
> > David
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-devel mailing list
> > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-devel