[rspec-devel] Updated HTML formatter template
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Thu Nov 30 08:17:57 EST 2006
On 11/30/06, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Luke Redpath <contact at lukeredpath.co.uk> wrote:
> > I've done a bit of work on the current RSpec HTML formatter template
> > - I've changed the stylesheet and played around with the markup a bit
> > to make it a bit more semantic (I've opted for definition lists for
> > the specs). You can view it here:
> > http://uploads.lukeredpath.co.uk/rspec.html
> Looks great in general but...
> > It still needs a bit of tweaking, but if nobody has any objections,
> > I'll roll this into the trunk.
> people generally associate red with failure and green with success (at
> least in the software testing domain). Aren't these colours at odds
> with the common conventions? My initial reaction was "This is all
Agreed. The feel is very nice but the red does imply failure.
Also - I think that w/ hundreds of specs, this page will get quite
long. I'd like to see something with slightly smaller fonts and less
space without sacrificing the nice look. One can wish, right?
> Can you show us one that has both passing and failing specs?
> > Cheers
> > Luke
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-devel mailing list
> > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-devel