[rspec-devel] Updated HTML formatter template

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Thu Nov 30 08:17:57 EST 2006


On 11/30/06, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Luke Redpath <contact at lukeredpath.co.uk> wrote:
> > I've done a bit of work on the current RSpec HTML formatter template
> > - I've changed the stylesheet and played around with the markup a bit
> > to make it a bit more semantic (I've opted for definition lists for
> > the specs). You can view it here:
> >
> > http://uploads.lukeredpath.co.uk/rspec.html
> >
>
> Looks great in general but...
>
> > It still needs a bit of tweaking, but if nobody has any objections,
> > I'll roll this into the trunk.
> >
>
> people generally associate red with failure and green with success (at
> least in the software testing domain). Aren't these colours at odds
> with the common conventions? My initial reaction was "This is all
> failures".
>

Agreed. The feel is very nice but the red does imply failure.

Also - I think that w/ hundreds of specs, this page will get quite
long. I'd like to see something with slightly smaller fonts and less
space without sacrificing the nice look. One can wish, right?

Thanks Luke,
David

> Can you show us one that has both passing and failing specs?
>
> Cheers,
> Aslak
>
> > Cheers
> > Luke
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-devel mailing list
> > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>


More information about the rspec-devel mailing list