[rspec-devel] underscores, sugar, and more and more bugs

Nick Sieger nicksieger at gmail.com
Mon Nov 20 16:11:50 EST 2006

On 11/20/06, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> Again, does anyone see a big difference between:
> @thing.should_be.something
> @thing.should_be :something
> For me, the latter cleanly separates what is framework (should_be)
> from what is supposed to be in your code (:something)

Now that you put it that way...no.

Either allows us to eliminate method_missing, so this is purely a
> syntax question.

Yep, and I don't wish to make a bikeshed out of this issue, but what do you
think about supporting both?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-devel/attachments/20061120/9845e353/attachment.html 

More information about the rspec-devel mailing list