[rspec-devel] underscores, sugar, and more and more bugs

Nick Sieger nicksieger at gmail.com
Mon Nov 20 15:36:02 EST 2006


On 11/20/06, Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> My opinion remains something like this:
> 1. Do away with underscores that require method_missing.
> 2. Implement all non-dynamic 'should' methods directly on Object.
> 3. Split anything dynamic with a period.


I agree with this, thanks for summing it up more succintly than I was able
to earlier.

sugar.rb is a nightmare. As evidence, I present the fact that my
> original .method_should_be_changed_by {block} patch was rejected
> because it needed to modify sugar.rb.
>
> Even the core team doesn't want to touch it. :)


Is this a remant from that fateful drunken night of Steve's that birthed
RSpec? :-)

/Nick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-devel/attachments/20061120/497587ee/attachment.html 


More information about the rspec-devel mailing list