[rspec-devel] [ rspec-Patches-6417 ] [PATCH] Support @object.some_method_should_be_changed_by {block}

noreply at rubyforge.org noreply at rubyforge.org
Mon Nov 6 12:51:11 EST 2006


Patches item #6417, was opened at 2006-10-31 16:36
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=3151&aid=6417&group_id=797

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Wilson Bilkovich (wilson)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: [PATCH] Support @object.some_method_should_be_changed_by {block}

Initial Comment:
I was toying with how to implement the RSpec equivalent of "assert_difference" from test/unit.
In case you haven't used it, it looks something like this:
assert_difference some_object, :some_method { some code here }

It calls some_object.some_method before and after the block, and fails if there is no difference.

This patch implements something similarly generic:

@some_object.some_method_should_be_changed_by {|obj| code here}
..and its inverse:
@some_object.some_method_should_not_be_changed_by {|obj| code here}

some_method is stripped from the beginning of the message, and passed forward for use inside the Should module.

Has specs, and all other existing specs still pass.

A real 'use case' example:

User.count_should_be_changed_by do
  User.create :login => 'quentin', :email => 'blah at example.com'...
end

User.count will be different before and after, so this expectation will be met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Wilson Bilkovich (wilson)
Date: 2006-11-06 12:51

Message:
Hrm. Are plugins going to be able to modify sugar.rb in a
forward-compatible way?
I'm not sure how to implement this without stepping in that
early in the chain.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Aslak Hellesøy (aslak_hellesoy)
Date: 2006-11-06 12:45

Message:
I think this is the kind of stuff we'd encourage people to bundle as an RSpec plugin. We don't have a plugin mechanism yet, but we'll hopefully have one soon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=3151&aid=6417&group_id=797


More information about the rspec-devel mailing list