[Rspec-devel] possible addition to expectations...

Byron Saltysiak byronsalty at gmail.com
Wed May 3 11:17:04 EDT 2006


very nice :)

On 5/2/06, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Done. Specs are now always pre-sweetened. Perhaps you'd like lemon
> with that spec?
>
> On 5/2/06, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2 is good enough for me. I'll address that this evening.
> >
> > On 5/2/06, David Astels <dastels at daveastels.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2-May-06, at 9:35 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > It turns out with --sweet both this.syntax and this_syntax are
> > > > supported. My thinking is we remove the switch (which only serves to
> > > > complain if you use the sweet_syntax without the sweet_switch) and
> > > > just have it running all the time (supporting both).
> > > >
> > > > Agree?
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Rspec-devel mailing list
> > > Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> > >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>



--
Byron
http://byron.saltysiak.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-devel/attachments/20060503/f52f2e4c/attachment.htm 


More information about the Rspec-devel mailing list