[Rspec-devel] possible addition to expectations...
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Tue May 2 20:48:21 EDT 2006
2 is good enough for me. I'll address that this evening.
On 5/2/06, David Astels <dastels at daveastels.com> wrote:
> On 2-May-06, at 9:35 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> > It turns out with --sweet both this.syntax and this_syntax are
> > supported. My thinking is we remove the switch (which only serves to
> > complain if you use the sweet_syntax without the sweet_switch) and
> > just have it running all the time (supporting both).
> > Agree?
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the Rspec-devel