[Rspec-devel] possible addition to expectations...

aslak hellesoy aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com
Tue May 2 20:37:46 EDT 2006


On 5/2/06, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> It turns out with --sweet both this.syntax and this_syntax are
> supported. My thinking is we remove the switch (which only serves to
> complain if you use the sweet_syntax without the sweet_switch) and
> just have it running all the time (supporting both).
>
> Agree?
>

+1

> On 5/1/06, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have applied Rich's sweet patch.
> > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/underscores.html
> > I tweaked a little so it works with mocks too.
> >
> > For now you have to run with --sweet - it's disabled by default.
> >
> > If, at a later stage we can establish that most of the rspec users
> > prefer the underscore (I am one of them) then I suggest we make
> > underscores enabled by default and update the documentation to use
> > underscores everywhere.
> >
> > WDYT?
> > Aslak
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rspec-devel mailing list
> > Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>



More information about the Rspec-devel mailing list