[Rspec-devel] possible addition to expectations...

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Tue May 2 20:35:12 EDT 2006

It turns out with --sweet both this.syntax and this_syntax are
supported. My thinking is we remove the switch (which only serves to
complain if you use the sweet_syntax without the sweet_switch) and
just have it running all the time (supporting both).


On 5/1/06, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have applied Rich's sweet patch.
> http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/underscores.html
> I tweaked a little so it works with mocks too.
> For now you have to run with --sweet - it's disabled by default.
> If, at a later stage we can establish that most of the rspec users
> prefer the underscore (I am one of them) then I suggest we make
> underscores enabled by default and update the documentation to use
> underscores everywhere.
> Aslak
> _______________________________________________
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel

More information about the Rspec-devel mailing list