[Rspec-devel] possible addition to expectations...
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Tue May 2 20:35:12 EDT 2006
It turns out with --sweet both this.syntax and this_syntax are
supported. My thinking is we remove the switch (which only serves to
complain if you use the sweet_syntax without the sweet_switch) and
just have it running all the time (supporting both).
On 5/1/06, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have applied Rich's sweet patch.
> I tweaked a little so it works with mocks too.
> For now you have to run with --sweet - it's disabled by default.
> If, at a later stage we can establish that most of the rspec users
> prefer the underscore (I am one of them) then I suggest we make
> underscores enabled by default and update the documentation to use
> underscores everywhere.
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the Rspec-devel