[Rspec-devel] PROPOSAL: --format and --dry-run

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Tue May 2 08:09:25 EDT 2006


I ALWAYS

On 5/1/06, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to add tool number eight to
> http://rspec.rubyforge.org/tools/index.html:
> HTML reports a la
> http://forge.objectweb.org/nightlybuilds/c-jdbc/tests/today/overview-summary.html
> (except a better browsing experience). HTML reports are particularly
> useful for larger projects, especially when specs are run on a
> continuous integration server - it makes it easier to spot the errors
> when they occur.
>
> I've done some refactorings in svn to make this a little easier. The
> old SimpleTextReporter is now two classes: Reporter and TextOutputter
> (Reporter has-a Reporter is the plan).
>
> I'd like to be able to specify the reporter on the command line via a
> --format option.
> It seems natural to use this option to specify --format=text
> (default), --format=rdoc and --format-html. So I'm planning a
> HtmlOutputter.
>
> Some additional refactorings would make this a little cleaner. First
> of all, the current --verbose option results in output that is very
> similar to the output produced by --doc. I propose to remove both of
> these options.
>
> --verbose becomes --format=rdoc
> --doc becomes --format=rdoc --dry-run
>
> The assumption here is that the rdoc format:
> # BDD framework
> # * should be adopted quickly
> # * should be intuitive
>
> is readable enough as it is in the console.
>
> The --dry-run option would only generate output (with whatever
> --format is specified), without actually running the specs. --dry-run
> is a common option for many other command line tools.
>
> I think these proposed command line changes would make the interface
> cleaner, as well as clean up some duplication inside rspec.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Aslak
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>



More information about the Rspec-devel mailing list