[Rspec-devel] should_be_nil or should.be.nil

[Evgeny]

Dots! :)

well, dots are more consistent anyways,
since x.y.z.q.w.e.r.t.y is better than x.y.z_q_w_e_r_t.y

On 6/7/06, Michael Granger <ged at faeriemud.org> wrote:
> On 6-Jun-06, at 2:28 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>
> > RSpec supports both dotted and underscored syntax.
> >
> > While users can choose whichever they like, I think the documentation
> > and examples we provide for RSpec should consistently use one style.
> > Right now it's rather confusing.
> >
> > To avoid confusing the users.
> >
> > Shall ve vote? Please reply to the latest reply - that makes
> > counting easier.
>
> Underscores.
>
> --
> Michael Granger <ged at FaerieMUD.org>
> Rubymage, Architect, Believer
> The FaerieMUD Consortium <http://www.faeriemud.org/>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>