[Rspec-devel] should_be_nil or should.be.nil
evgeny.zislis at gmail.com
Tue Jun 6 19:05:30 EDT 2006
well, dots are more consistent anyways,
since x.y.z.q.w.e.r.t.y is better than x.y.z_q_w_e_r_t.y
On 6/7/06, Michael Granger <ged at faeriemud.org> wrote:
> On 6-Jun-06, at 2:28 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
> > RSpec supports both dotted and underscored syntax.
> > While users can choose whichever they like, I think the documentation
> > and examples we provide for RSpec should consistently use one style.
> > Right now it's rather confusing.
> > To avoid confusing the users.
> > Shall ve vote? Please reply to the latest reply - that makes
> > counting easier.
> Michael Granger <ged at FaerieMUD.org>
> Rubymage, Architect, Believer
> The FaerieMUD Consortium <http://www.faeriemud.org/>
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the Rspec-devel