[Rspec-devel] Rspec on Rails is broken in SVN
brian.takita at gmail.com
Sat Jul 22 16:00:01 EDT 2006
I fixed the nil.should_* methods for rspec_on_rails. The fix is in the
On 7/21/06, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/21/06, Steven R. Baker <srbaker at pobox.com> wrote:
> > >> The other is this whole sugar thing. This is like the 5th time it's
> > >> come up as a problem w/ changes we're making. I propose that we
> > >> draw a
> > >> line in the sand right now. We're either committed to it, which means
> > >> that all changes must be tested to not conflict w/ sugar (which means
> > >> there should be tests that are expressed using the _ syntax) or we
> > >> should bag the thing. I'm leaning more and more towards bagging it,
> > >> but I understand the desires of users to have the more rubyish
> > >> syntax.
> > >> It's just that it makes rspec brittle. Maybe it's just that we
> > >> need an
> > >> implementation that is less ticklish.
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Bag it & tag it.
> > >
> > Nope. It's what the users want. It'll be made to work.
> Make it work.
> Then say nope.
> Not the other way around.
> > > For the trouble it's caused, it doesn't bring much to the table... 0
> > > functionallity.
> > -Steven
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rspec-devel mailing list
> > Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rspec-devel