[Rspec-devel] Rspec on Rails is broken in SVN
aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com
Fri Jul 21 12:33:11 EDT 2006
On 7/21/06, Steven R. Baker <srbaker at pobox.com> wrote:
> >> The other is this whole sugar thing. This is like the 5th time it's
> >> come up as a problem w/ changes we're making. I propose that we
> >> draw a
> >> line in the sand right now. We're either committed to it, which means
> >> that all changes must be tested to not conflict w/ sugar (which means
> >> there should be tests that are expressed using the _ syntax) or we
> >> should bag the thing. I'm leaning more and more towards bagging it,
> >> but I understand the desires of users to have the more rubyish
> >> syntax.
> >> It's just that it makes rspec brittle. Maybe it's just that we
> >> need an
> >> implementation that is less ticklish.
> >> Thoughts?
> > Bag it & tag it.
> Nope. It's what the users want. It'll be made to work.
Make it work.
Then say nope.
Not the other way around.
> > For the trouble it's caused, it doesn't bring much to the table... 0
> > functionallity.
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the Rspec-devel