[Rspec-devel] Rspec on Rails is broken in SVN
Steven R. Baker
srbaker at pobox.com
Fri Jul 21 12:17:21 EDT 2006
>> The other is this whole sugar thing. This is like the 5th time it's
>> come up as a problem w/ changes we're making. I propose that we
>> draw a
>> line in the sand right now. We're either committed to it, which means
>> that all changes must be tested to not conflict w/ sugar (which means
>> there should be tests that are expressed using the _ syntax) or we
>> should bag the thing. I'm leaning more and more towards bagging it,
>> but I understand the desires of users to have the more rubyish
>> It's just that it makes rspec brittle. Maybe it's just that we
>> need an
>> implementation that is less ticklish.
> Bag it & tag it.
Nope. It's what the users want. It'll be made to work.
> For the trouble it's caused, it doesn't bring much to the table... 0
More information about the Rspec-devel