[Rspec-devel] Rspec on Rails is broken in SVN

Steven R. Baker srbaker at pobox.com
Fri Jul 21 12:17:21 EDT 2006

>> The other is this whole sugar thing. This is like the 5th time it's
>> come up as a problem w/ changes we're making. I propose that we  
>> draw a
>> line in the sand right now. We're either committed to it, which means
>> that all changes must be tested to not conflict w/ sugar (which means
>> there should be tests that are expressed using the _ syntax) or we
>> should bag the thing. I'm  leaning more and more towards bagging it,
>> but I understand the desires of users to have the more rubyish  
>> syntax.
>> It's just that it makes rspec brittle. Maybe it's just that we  
>> need an
>> implementation that is less ticklish.
>> Thoughts?
> Bag it & tag it.

Nope.  It's what the users want.  It'll be made to work.

> For the trouble it's caused, it doesn't bring much to the table... 0
> functionallity.


More information about the Rspec-devel mailing list