[Rspec-devel] Rspec on Rails is broken in SVN

David Astels dastels at daveastels.com
Fri Jul 21 11:33:31 EDT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 21-Jul-06, at 11:47 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:

> The other is this whole sugar thing. This is like the 5th time it's
> come up as a problem w/ changes we're making. I propose that we draw a
> line in the sand right now. We're either committed to it, which means
> that all changes must be tested to not conflict w/ sugar (which means
> there should be tests that are expressed using the _ syntax) or we
> should bag the thing. I'm  leaning more and more towards bagging it,
> but I understand the desires of users to have the more rubyish syntax.
> It's just that it makes rspec brittle. Maybe it's just that we need an
> implementation that is less ticklish.
>
> Thoughts?

Bag it & tag it.

For the trouble it's caused, it doesn't bring much to the table... 0  
functionallity.

Dave


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEwPPLauez/L4x7g4RAuzpAKDYribvY0gqhmiSOu4qy9o7a90zkwCfWC7S
plggcOWqoeU62rnxBdpVjkE=
=R/pK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Rspec-devel mailing list