[Rspec-devel] Rspec on Rails is broken in SVN
dastels at daveastels.com
Fri Jul 21 11:33:31 EDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 21-Jul-06, at 11:47 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> The other is this whole sugar thing. This is like the 5th time it's
> come up as a problem w/ changes we're making. I propose that we draw a
> line in the sand right now. We're either committed to it, which means
> that all changes must be tested to not conflict w/ sugar (which means
> there should be tests that are expressed using the _ syntax) or we
> should bag the thing. I'm leaning more and more towards bagging it,
> but I understand the desires of users to have the more rubyish syntax.
> It's just that it makes rspec brittle. Maybe it's just that we need an
> implementation that is less ticklish.
Bag it & tag it.
For the trouble it's caused, it doesn't bring much to the table... 0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Rspec-devel