[Rspec-devel] possible addition to expectations...
rich at infoether.com
Mon Apr 24 16:02:03 EDT 2006
On Apr 24, 2006, at 2:06 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>>> that's not a big deal as long as we alias the old method_missing and
>>> delegate to it if the :method doesn't =~ /should_.*/
>> what about other messages =~ /should_.*/ that aren't ours?
> I think that's very unlikely - just like collision with an other
> should is unlikely.
> We can address that with a commanline switch to disable the
> /should_.*/ syntax - and have it enabled by default.
The same is for should itself. Since the should_ is a string, it can
easily be available at runtime via a switch. Its just spliting/
>> Rspec-devel mailing list
>> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the Rspec-devel