From lists at ruby-forum.com Fri Sep 28 20:21:02 2007 From: lists at ruby-forum.com (Andreas S.) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 02:21:02 +0200 Subject: ragel version detection in Rakefile is broken Message-ID: <31181c2938bc6ac35ee01e843962cb3f@ruby-forum.com> Version 5.7 is lower than 5.18, the Rakefile fails to detect that. Patch attached. Attachments: http://www.ruby-forum.com/attachment/471/Rakefile.patch -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. From lists at ruby-forum.com Fri Sep 28 20:22:19 2007 From: lists at ruby-forum.com (Andreas S.) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 02:22:19 +0200 Subject: Ragel memory usage explodes Message-ID: Rev. 190 Ragel 5.7 The following command had already eaten 1.5 GB RAM when I killed it: ragel superredcloth_inline.rl | rlcodegen -G2 -o superredcloth_inline.c -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. From lists at ruby-forum.com Sat Sep 29 07:53:17 2007 From: lists at ruby-forum.com (Andreas S.) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:53:17 +0200 Subject: ragel version detection in Rakefile is broken In-Reply-To: <31181c2938bc6ac35ee01e843962cb3f@ruby-forum.com> References: <31181c2938bc6ac35ee01e843962cb3f@ruby-forum.com> Message-ID: Andreas S. wrote: > Version 5.7 is lower than 5.18, the Rakefile fails to detect that. Patch > attached. Ok, this introduces another bug (6.1 < 5.18); who would have thought something trivial like this could be implemented wrong twice? (@ragel_v[0] == 5 && @ragel_v[1] >= 18) || @ragel_v[0] > 5 -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.