[raleigh.rb] Apache 2.0x <=> Pound <=> Mongrel, any experience?
rick.denatale at gmail.com
Wed Oct 18 22:31:45 EDT 2006
Thanks, I guess it goes on the to-do list.
On 10/18/06, Hugh Cayless <philomousos at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been running Apache 2.0 + pound + Mongrel for about a month
> now. It seems to work just fine. Setup was fairly straightforward
> and no ill effects to speak of yet.
> On Oct 18, 2006, at 6:32 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> > I'm currently running an Apache 2.0 server which hosts several web
> > apps, some for internal use, and a couple for outside use.
> > The two biggest outside use sites are my talklikeaduck blog, and a
> > mediawiki site that gets fairly high traffic.
> > The blog uses typo and right now, I've got an apache virtual server
> > which proxys to mongrel for that.
> > I'd like to see if a mongrel cluster would help performance, but since
> > I'm not running Apache 2.1 I don't have access to mod-proxy-balancer,
> > and I really don't want to go through the upheaval of a major Apache
> > upgrade.
> > So I was thinking of putting pound between Apache and Mongrel.
> > Stupid idea? Comments? Experiences?
> > --
> > Rick
> > _______________________________________________
> > raleigh-rb-members mailing list
> > raleigh-rb-members at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/raleigh-rb-members
> raleigh-rb-members mailing list
> raleigh-rb-members at rubyforge.org
My blog on Ruby
IPMS/USA Region 12 Coordinator
Visit the Project Mercury Wiki Site
More information about the raleigh-rb-members