[Rake-devel] Rake 0.9.3.beta.2 with -j option
Jim Weirich
jim.weirich at gmail.com
Tue Oct 23 23:05:47 UTC 2012
On Oct 23, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Mark Watson <watsonmw at gmail.com> wrote:
> What about having the old code called by default and if you specify -j
> the new parallel code is executed? That way old rakefiles still work,
> and new ones can take advantage of the -j feature
So you check out a new project from GitHub and decide to run rake on it. How do you decide if its safe to run with -j or not? Try it and see? Wait for subtle unreproducible race conditions to manifest?
> (after all that was good enough for GNUmake).
GNUMake mainly deals with shelling out to commands. I suspect Rakefiles that mainly shell out to compilers and linkers will have little problem with -j.
It's the Rakefiles that execute significant Ruby code in process that I'm concerned about. And maybe I'm overly concerned about this issue, but I've dealt with real-time systems and multiple threads in a past life and know how tricky it can be to get things right.[1]
--
-- Jim Weirich
-- jim.weirich at gmail.com
[1] Ask me sometime about my 1 in a million failure.
More information about the Rake-devel
mailing list