[Rake-devel] Planning on Releasing on Monday: Rake 0.9.3 and 10.0.0

Luis Lavena luislavena at gmail.com
Sun Nov 11 04:34:47 UTC 2012


On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jim Weirich <jim.weirich at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm planning on publishing Rake 0.9.3 and 10.0.0 on Monday, so's here's the last chance on reporting any bugs in either of those versions.
>

The following patches fix 1 failure and one noisy output during tests:

https://gist.github.com/4053715

The noisy output should be using the "skip" instead, so I've changed it.

This happens on both master and next-major-release branches.

With patches applied:

next-major-release (10.0.0)

ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10) [i386-mingw32]
455 tests, 1298 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 1 skips

ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [i386-mingw32]
455 tests, 1298 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 1 skips

ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [x64-mingw32]
455 tests, 1298 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 1 skips

master (0.9.3):

ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10) [i386-mingw32]
474 tests, 1389 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 1 skips

ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [i386-mingw32]
474 tests, 1389 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 1 skips

ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [x64-mingw32]
474 tests, 1389 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 1 skips

Shouldn't 10.0.0 have more tests than 0.9.3? Either way, let me know
if you prefer a pull request to fix the bogus failures.

Thank you.
--
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupéry


More information about the Rake-devel mailing list