From zach.dennis at gmail.com Fri Mar 7 14:26:50 2008 From: zach.dennis at gmail.com (Zach Dennis) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:26:50 -0500 Subject: [Rake-devel] Am I getting through? Message-ID: <85d99afe0803071126y369fad27r4d46ed0080301f16@mail.gmail.com> This is more of a test response. I've sent a few mailings to the list over the passed few months, but I've never seen a response and I've never seen my message come through. I am guessing my messages aren't getting through. If someone does see this can you respond to the list and to me privately. thanks, Zach -- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com From assaph at gmail.com Fri Mar 7 14:55:08 2008 From: assaph at gmail.com (Assaph Mehr) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 06:55:08 +1100 Subject: [Rake-devel] Am I getting through? In-Reply-To: <85d99afe0803071126y369fad27r4d46ed0080301f16@mail.gmail.com> References: <85d99afe0803071126y369fad27r4d46ed0080301f16@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3ff47be90803071155w4a998da8s2566bddac61a965@mail.gmail.com> G'day Zach, Hope all's well your side of the Atlantic :) On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:26 AM, Zach Dennis wrote: > This is more of a test response. I've sent a few mailings to the list > over the passed few months, but I've never seen a response and I've > never seen my message come through. I am guessing my messages aren't > getting through. If someone does see this can you respond to the list > and to me privately. thanks, > > Zach > > > -- > Zach Dennis > http://www.continuousthinking.com > _______________________________________________ > Rake-devel mailing list > Rake-devel at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rake-devel > From adamm at zombino.com Sun Mar 9 19:17:46 2008 From: adamm at zombino.com (Adam Majer) Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Rake-devel] Am I getting through? In-Reply-To: <85d99afe0803071126y369fad27r4d46ed0080301f16@mail.gmail.com> References: <85d99afe0803071126y369fad27r4d46ed0080301f16@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47D4701A.4010605@zombino.com> Zach Dennis wrote: > This is more of a test response. I've sent a few mailings to the list > over the passed few months, but I've never seen a response and I've > never seen my message come through. I am guessing my messages aren't > getting through. If someone does see this can you respond to the list > and to me privately. thanks, This is the first email I've seen from you on the list since I've been subscribed. That was about January 26th this year. - Adam -- Mail Etiquette ============== * Quote properly or not at all. Top posters, this applies to you! * When replying to posts on mailing lists, only address the mailing list unless poster explicitly requested you include them in CC From transfire at gmail.com Fri Mar 21 10:58:42 2008 From: transfire at gmail.com (Trans) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Rake-devel] Rakefile optional when using a rake directory In-Reply-To: References: <4b6f054f0802231731h3b739480y106e76252b74739c@mail.gmail.com> <8B0337DD-AE18-41AD-88D2-1E1250E28BDA@labnotes.org> <4b6f054f0802231819v32867d20ge3ab6d2de925659c@mail.gmail.com> <4b6f054f0802250354u4ac971t9bf466365738160e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4b6f054f0803210758g20fe2413vef62dec78bb1c743@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Jim Weirich wrote: > As I understand it, there are two requests here. > > (1) Change the name of rakelib to rake (or maybe just added rake in > addition to rakelib?) > (2) Allow the omission of the Rakefile if rake (or rakelib?) is present. > > On (1), I am disinclined to change the name of rakelib (or add > additional redundant functionality) in the absence of a compelling > reason to do so. I believe the reason you assert if merely a > preference for the shorter name, correct? I can understand not changing it --no reason to break backward compatibility, but adding it as an alternative, it seems to me, can only be advantageous. It's not reasonless. Aesthetics is a vital aspect of ease of use. Clearly, this can be subjective and it is impossible to please everyone, but rake/ seems a very reasonable --even obvious, option, to me. It much like supporting Rakefile or rakefile.rb. So I hope you won't dismiss it simply because it is "merely" a question of aesthetics. That has value too. > On (2), this is a more interesting proposal. I'm not sure I would use > the feature myself, but if there is a wider desire amoung rake users > for this, I might consider it. > > Fair 'nuff? That's quite fair. Thank you. I hope the pulse of Rake users will prove favorable. Thanks Jim, T. From adam.q.salter at gmail.com Thu Mar 27 05:41:47 2008 From: adam.q.salter at gmail.com (Adam Salter) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:41:47 +1100 Subject: [Rake-devel] Next rake gem release Message-ID: <5345B01F-57FB-40AA-A0C3-B9C37CEFEE18@gmail.com> Jim, Just wondering if there will be another rake release anytime soon? I sent a patch to the task args handling, and would like to be able to use in my publicly available projects... Best, -Adam