[Rake-devel] Tasks to aid installation?
schapht at gmail.com
Thu Jun 21 10:27:52 EDT 2007
On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:37 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
> Yes, it's been considered. But Jeff hasn't decided to do this yet,
> and it's his project. I think that would be too big a change to
> contribute at the moment, and...
Again, I think you can do it without upsetting the current tree. You
just get less magic.
> ...to do that I'd still want to use rake effectively, so I'd need be
> able to find out about these tasks that I can't see links to.
>> creation tools (e.g., hoe) usually assume a different directory
>> structure than what's in the glark package. Tough to say how much
> So I DO still need to know what tools exist to help me make this
> platform agnostic.
Rubygems does that. You tell the gem where the ruby libs and the
bins are (possibly man pages too, not sure though) and rubygems
handles the installation.
>> magic you can squeeze out of it without disturbing the directory
>> But see if Jeff is interested in using rubygems to install. If so,
>> the new gem file would work on any platform that had rubygems
>> available (The common windows ruby installer has it pre-bundled).
> That's a selling point, but I'd still be inflicting the learning
> curve on him. And gems assumes some fluency in Rake, which is
> what my question was about.
Sorry if I misunderstood the original question. Good luck either
way. Rake isn't hard and if the author is really averse to it, you
can do it yourself. Just make a Rakefile that builds the .gem, then
pass the gem around to people that need it.
More information about the Rake-devel