Hi folks.<br><br>I just downloaded from the svn link and ran task/test and got the following:<br><br>Finished in 7.722335 seconds<br><br>19 examples, 13 failures<br><br>Is this the same thing you guys are getting or am I even more out of whack than you?<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Dan<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 27/02/2008, <b class="gmail_sendername">Trans</b> <<a href="mailto:transfire@gmail.com">transfire@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Feb 27, 4:41 pm, "Jonathan Buch" <<a href="mailto:j...@oxyliquit.de">j...@oxyliquit.de</a>> wrote:<br> > Hi,<br> ><br> > > I think so. I'm still trying to understand it myself. I assume it was<br>
> > correct to just load all the .rb files within the test/ directory.<br> > > Since there is no spec_ prefix, or anything like that, I could only<br> ><br> > another annoyance; one gets what one asks for. :P<br>
<br> <br>:D If it's any consolation I'll buy a beer (or preferred beverage).<br> <br><br> > > assume this to be the case. It seems to be working for the most part --<br> > > with the exception of warnings about constants being reset. I will<br>
> > keep working to improve this, and make sure it is working right Any<br> > > help you can offer in the way of this is appreciated.<br> ><br> > >> that only `rake test` or similar has to be done<br>
><br> > > Yes, just run "ruby task/test".<br> ><br> > jo:ogden jo:0$ ruby task/test<br> > ruby: No such file or directory -- task/test (LoadError)<br> > jo:ogden jo:1$ ls task/<br> > clobber rdoc setup<br>
<br> <br>Sorry. I worked on these last night and forgot to check them in. They<br> should be there now.<br> <br><br> > >> and that a strict 'only patches passing all tests'-policy will be used<br> > >> on Ogden - then I will have a look at the failing specs.<br>
><br> > > Yes. After we get 0.50 out the door (which George has been asking me<br> > > do for weeks now), we will switch to a proper patch policy with<br> > > branches and passing tests.<br> ><br>
> But of course, until there is actually a Ogden which has no failing<br> > tests, that point is moot. But I like the plan. :)<br> ><br> > > In fact, would you like to be in change of overseeing that?<br>
><br> > No, I don't see that coming yet. As I'm wrapping up my University<br> > time this semester, I very much doubt I have the leasure time to<br> > do maintainer work.<br> > All I hope I can do is putting my Og knowledge to use to at least get<br>
> it in a half stable state.<br> <br> <br>Understood. Hopefully a couple of other interested and capable<br> programmers will turn up once we get 0.50 out the door. I'm pretty<br> busy too.<br> <br><br> T.<br> <br>
_______________________________________________<br> Nitro-general mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Nitro-general@rubyforge.org">Nitro-general@rubyforge.org</a><br> <a href="http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general">http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>