blow its ok...<br><br>-g.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 26, 2007 11:18 PM, Trans <<a href="mailto:transfire@gmail.com">transfire@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br>On Dec 26, 2:06 pm, "Kirk Haines" <<a href="mailto:wyhai...@gmail.com">wyhai...@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><div class="Ih2E3d">> On Dec 26, 2007 11:40 AM, Trans <<a href="mailto:transf...@gmail.com">
transf...@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> > Hi--<br>><br>> > I've gotten a little bit of flack about the name of the "blow"<br>> > project. So I was thinking of changing it to something a little more
<br>> > obvious like "webits".<br>><br>> > What do you all think?<br>><br>> I think that "webits" is nearly as bad as "blow". It just a little<br>> too artificial as an English word. It doesn't decode smoothly.
<br><br></div>Maybe you are right. I just thought of it in terms of having a similar<br>sound structure to "facets".<br><font color="#888888"><br>T.<br></font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________
<br>Nitro-general mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Nitro-general@rubyforge.org">Nitro-general@rubyforge.org</a><br><a href="http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general" target="_blank">http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
</a><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://gmosx.me.gr">http://gmosx.me.gr</a><br><a href="http://joy.gr">http://joy.gr</a><br><a href="http://cull.gr">http://cull.gr</a><br><a href="http://nitroproject.org">
http://nitroproject.org</a><br><a href="http://phidz.com">http://phidz.com</a><br><a href="http://joyerz.com">http://joyerz.com</a>