Hello all<br><br>If "blow" does stuff on the web, is a name like <br><br> * "", or<br> * ""<br><br>As web spinning spiders (with side-closing jaws: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Araneomorphae">
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Araneomorphae</a>) seem appropriate? <br><br>Or you can go 'pseudo academic' and pick a latin seeming name or just interesting name like "<span style="font-style: italic;">arachno
</span>", "spider", "spinners" ... (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider</a>)<br><br>Thing relating to web or nets ....<br><br>Food for thought,<br> \__Will
<br><br>(eat well)<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 27/12/2007, <b class="gmail_sendername">Trans</b> <<a href="mailto:transfire@gmail.com">transfire@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Dec 26, 2:55 pm, "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <<a href="mailto:zn...@cesmail.net">zn...@cesmail.net</a>> wrote:<br>> Trans wrote:<br>> > I've gotten a little bit of flack about the name of the "blow"
<br>> > project. So I was thinking of changing it to something a little more<br>> > obvious like "webits".<br>><br>> Just out of curiosity, what does "blow" do? :)<br><br>Blow is a spin-off of Facets. All of Facets' web-related libraries
<br>were separated out into this project. Turned out to be a good move<br>actually. It's already become a much stronger lib. I recently added an<br>XML DesignKit and I used to create an Atom builder and I've almost
<br>finished an RSS builder. Of course there are generic XML and HTML<br>builders too. It also includes some extensions to URI, an html filter,<br>a css filter, and more.<br></blockquote></div><br>