[Nitro] First Comes Og
tastapod at gmail.com
Sun Mar 23 16:34:15 EDT 2008
I just downloaded from the svn link and ran task/test and got the following:
Finished in 7.722335 seconds
19 examples, 13 failures
Is this the same thing you guys are getting or am I even more out of whack
On 27/02/2008, Trans <transfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 27, 4:41 pm, "Jonathan Buch" <j... at oxyliquit.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > > I think so. I'm still trying to understand it myself. I assume it was
> > > correct to just load all the .rb files within the test/ directory.
> > > Since there is no spec_ prefix, or anything like that, I could only
> > another annoyance; one gets what one asks for. :P
> :D If it's any consolation I'll buy a beer (or preferred beverage).
> > > assume this to be the case. It seems to be working for the most part
> > > with the exception of warnings about constants being reset. I will
> > > keep working to improve this, and make sure it is working right Any
> > > help you can offer in the way of this is appreciated.
> > >> that only `rake test` or similar has to be done
> > > Yes, just run "ruby task/test".
> > jo:ogden jo:0$ ruby task/test
> > ruby: No such file or directory -- task/test (LoadError)
> > jo:ogden jo:1$ ls task/
> > clobber rdoc setup
> Sorry. I worked on these last night and forgot to check them in. They
> should be there now.
> > >> and that a strict 'only patches passing all tests'-policy will be
> > >> on Ogden - then I will have a look at the failing specs.
> > > Yes. After we get 0.50 out the door (which George has been asking me
> > > do for weeks now), we will switch to a proper patch policy with
> > > branches and passing tests.
> > But of course, until there is actually a Ogden which has no failing
> > tests, that point is moot. But I like the plan. :)
> > > In fact, would you like to be in change of overseeing that?
> > No, I don't see that coming yet. As I'm wrapping up my University
> > time this semester, I very much doubt I have the leasure time to
> > do maintainer work.
> > All I hope I can do is putting my Og knowledge to use to at least get
> > it in a half stable state.
> Understood. Hopefully a couple of other interested and capable
> programmers will turn up once we get 0.50 out the door. I'm pretty
> busy too.
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nitro-general