From george.moschovitis at gmail.com Sat Feb 2 09:06:11 2008 From: george.moschovitis at gmail.com (George Moschovitis) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:06:11 +0200 Subject: [Nitro] 0.50.0 updated gems Message-ID: here are the gems with updated dependencies.... I would appreciate if someone can try them and report any problems. -g. -- http://gmosx.me.gr http://joy.gr http://cull.gr http://nitroproject.org http://phidz.com http://joyerz.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080202/5c532f41/attachment.html From arne at arnebrasseur.net Sat Feb 2 10:01:59 2008 From: arne at arnebrasseur.net (Arne Brasseur) Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 23:01:59 +0800 Subject: [Nitro] 0.50.0 updated gems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47A485E7.1080406@arnebrasseur.net> George Moschovitis schreef: > here are the gems with updated dependencies.... > I would appreciate if someone can try them and report any problems. Are they on their way? > > -g. > > -- > http://gmosx.me.gr > http://joy.gr > http://cull.gr > http://nitroproject.org > http://phidz.com > http://joyerz.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Nitro-general mailing list > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general -- Ein Fuchs mu? tun, was ein Fuchs tun mu? arne at arnebrasseur.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080202/cc8c4250/attachment.html From john at oxyliquit.de Sat Feb 2 10:11:46 2008 From: john at oxyliquit.de (Jonathan Buch) Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:11:46 +0100 Subject: [Nitro] 0.50.0 updated gems In-Reply-To: <47A485E7.1080406@arnebrasseur.net> References: <47A485E7.1080406@arnebrasseur.net> Message-ID: Hi, >> here are the gems with updated dependencies.... >> I would appreciate if someone can try them and report any problems. > Are they on their way? was just on the way to write another "nope ;D" message. *g* Jo -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From george.moschovitis at gmail.com Sat Feb 2 10:26:43 2008 From: george.moschovitis at gmail.com (George Moschovitis) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:26:43 +0200 Subject: [Nitro] gems 1 Message-ID: -g. -- http://gmosx.me.gr http://joy.gr http://cull.gr http://nitroproject.org http://phidz.com http://joyerz.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080202/0f67e6e5/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: nitro-0.50.0.gem Type: application/octet-stream Size: 169984 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080202/0f67e6e5/attachment-0001.obj From george.moschovitis at gmail.com Sat Feb 2 10:27:02 2008 From: george.moschovitis at gmail.com (George Moschovitis) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:27:02 +0200 Subject: [Nitro] gem 2 Message-ID: -- http://gmosx.me.gr http://joy.gr http://cull.gr http://nitroproject.org http://phidz.com http://joyerz.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080202/de92147f/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: og-0.50.0.gem Type: application/octet-stream Size: 109056 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080202/de92147f/attachment-0001.obj From george.moschovitis at gmail.com Sat Feb 2 10:27:22 2008 From: george.moschovitis at gmail.com (George Moschovitis) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:27:22 +0200 Subject: [Nitro] gem3 Message-ID: -- http://gmosx.me.gr http://joy.gr http://cull.gr http://nitroproject.org http://phidz.com http://joyerz.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080202/8d989d61/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: raw-0.50.0.gem Type: application/octet-stream Size: 93696 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080202/8d989d61/attachment-0001.obj From john at oxyliquit.de Sat Feb 2 10:34:43 2008 From: john at oxyliquit.de (Jonathan Buch) Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:34:43 +0100 Subject: [Nitro] gem3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, jo:~ jo:0$ irb irb(main):001:0> require 'raw' NoMethodError: undefined method `before' for Raw::Mixin::Sweeper:Module from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/raw-0.50.0/lib/raw/model/sweeper.rb:24 from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/roll/library.rb:283:in `require_without_roll' from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/roll/library.rb:283:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/roll/library.rb:852:in `gem_original_require' from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require' require'ing Og and Nitro works though. And requireing raw after nitro works too. Or maybe raw shouldn't be required standalon anyway? Jo -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From anyninbign at gmail.com Sat Feb 2 10:53:24 2008 From: anyninbign at gmail.com (Greg Clark) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Nitro] gem3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: irb(main):001:0> require 'rubygems' => true irb(main):002:0> require 'raw' => true i can require raw. -Greg On Feb 2, 2008 10:34 AM, Jonathan Buch wrote: > Hi, > > jo:~ jo:0$ irb > irb(main):001:0> require 'raw' > NoMethodError: undefined method `before' for Raw::Mixin::Sweeper:Module > from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/raw-0.50.0 > /lib/raw/model/sweeper.rb:24 > from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/roll/library.rb:283:in > `require_without_roll' > from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/roll/library.rb:283:in `require' > from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/roll/library.rb:852:in > `gem_original_require' > from > > /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in > `require' > > > require'ing Og and Nitro works though. And requireing raw after > nitro works too. Or maybe raw shouldn't be required standalon > anyway? > > Jo > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > _______________________________________________ > Nitro-general mailing list > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080202/627c2f94/attachment.html From george.moschovitis at gmail.com Sat Feb 2 12:01:31 2008 From: george.moschovitis at gmail.com (George Moschovitis) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:01:31 +0200 Subject: [Nitro] 0.50.0 RELEASES file Message-ID: Dear devs, I have updated the file doc/RELEASES in the repo. I would appreciate if some of you could have a look at this file and the rest of the files in doc, and fix some typo/english errors. thanks, -g. -- http://gmosx.me.gr http://joy.gr http://cull.gr http://nitroproject.org http://phidz.com http://joyerz.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080202/6f9764e6/attachment.html From rob at robmela.com Sun Feb 3 16:14:19 2008 From: rob at robmela.com (Robert Mela) Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:14:19 -0500 Subject: [Nitro] gems 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47A62EAB.1030702@robmela.com> Install of raw and og went fine. Nitro installs but the ri doc doesn't: robert-melas-computer-3:~/downloads rmela$ sudo -u root gem install nitro-0.50.0.gem Successfully installed nitro, version 0.50.0 Installing ri documentation for nitro-0.50.0... File not found: vendor robert-melas-computer-3:~/downloads rmela$ George Moschovitis wrote: > -g. > > -- > http://gmosx.me.gr > http://joy.gr > http://cull.gr > http://nitroproject.org > http://phidz.com > http://joyerz.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Nitro-general mailing list > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: rob.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 116 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080203/3d6558d2/attachment.vcf From rob at robmela.com Sun Feb 3 16:29:05 2008 From: rob at robmela.com (Robert Mela) Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Nitro] 0.50.0 updated gems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47A63221.9090601@robmela.com> Is Og many-to-many still broken? Or am I doing something wrong... the attached example still throws this exception: /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/og-0.50.0/lib/og/collection.rb:274:in `send': undefined method `remove' for [#]:Array (NoMethodError) from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/og-0.50.0/lib/og/collection.rb:274:in `method_missing' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/og-0.50.0/lib/og/collection.rb:134:in `<<' from mtmbug.rb:31 Thx, r George Moschovitis wrote: > here are the gems with updated dependencies.... > I would appreciate if someone can try them and report any problems. > > -g. > > -- > http://gmosx.me.gr > http://joy.gr > http://cull.gr > http://nitroproject.org > http://phidz.com > http://joyerz.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Nitro-general mailing list > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: mtmbug.rb Type: application/x-ruby Size: 451 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080203/9de91725/attachment.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: rob.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 116 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080203/9de91725/attachment.vcf From george.moschovitis at gmail.com Sun Feb 3 17:53:23 2008 From: george.moschovitis at gmail.com (George Moschovitis) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:53:23 +0200 Subject: [Nitro] 0.50.0 updated gems In-Reply-To: <47A63221.9090601@robmela.com> References: <47A63221.9090601@robmela.com> Message-ID: Ok, will check both of your problems, thanks for reporting. -g. 2008/2/3 Robert Mela : > Is Og many-to-many still broken? Or am I doing something wrong... the > attached example still throws this exception: > > /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/og-0.50.0/lib/og/collection.rb:274:in > `send': undefined method `remove' for [# @name="tag1">]:Array (NoMethodError) > from > /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/og-0.50.0/lib/og/collection.rb:274:in > `method_missing' > from > /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/og-0.50.0/lib/og/collection.rb:134:in > `<<' > from mtmbug.rb:31 > > Thx, > r > > George Moschovitis wrote: > > here are the gems with updated dependencies.... > > I would appreciate if someone can try them and report any problems. > > > > -g. > > > > -- > > http://gmosx.me.gr > > http://joy.gr > > http://cull.gr > > http://nitroproject.org > > http://phidz.com > > http://joyerz.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Nitro-general mailing list > > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general > > > _______________________________________________ > Nitro-general mailing list > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general > -- http://gmosx.me.gr http://joy.gr http://cull.gr http://nitroproject.org http://phidz.com http://joyerz.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080204/7feb3a75/attachment.html From george.moschovitis at gmail.com Mon Feb 4 11:09:14 2008 From: george.moschovitis at gmail.com (George Moschovitis) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:09:14 +0200 Subject: [Nitro] question for unix wizzards Message-ID: Dear devs, 2 small unix related questions. does anyone know about: - a quick and easy way to remove duplicate lines from a text files? - a quick and easy way to decide if two image (binary) files are the same image/picture? thanks in advance for your help! -g. -- http://gmosx.me.gr http://joy.gr http://cull.gr http://nitroproject.org http://phidz.com http://joyerz.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080204/ac0082ce/attachment.html From john at oxyliquit.de Mon Feb 4 11:31:05 2008 From: john at oxyliquit.de (Jonathan Buch) Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:31:05 +0100 Subject: [Nitro] question for unix wizzards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, > - a quick and easy way to remove duplicate lines from a text files? cat file | sort | uniq > file # should work (if the sorting doesn't matter in the file) cat file | uniq > file # works if the duplicate lines are next to each other > - a quick and easy way to decide if two image (binary) files are the same > image/picture? findimagedupes << search for that in google, I'm using one of those perl scripts. > thanks in advance for your help! Hope that helps, Jo -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From eeklund at gmail.com Mon Feb 4 11:31:35 2008 From: eeklund at gmail.com (Eivind Eklund) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:31:35 +0100 Subject: [Nitro] question for unix wizzards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Feb 4, 2008 5:09 PM, George Moschovitis wrote: > Dear devs, > > 2 small unix related questions. > > does anyone know about: > > - a quick and easy way to remove duplicate lines from a text files? uniq < filename (assuming that the lines are consequtive; otherwise, you need to do a sort first, or keep the lines in a hash in either Ruby or Perl) > - a quick and easy way to decide if two image (binary) files are the same > image/picture? Do you mean if they are identical? cmp should do it. Another approach is to get a checksum of the files (e.g. using "openssl rmd160 ") and see if the checksum is the same. Eivind. From Reid.Thompson at ateb.com Mon Feb 4 11:49:55 2008 From: Reid.Thompson at ateb.com (Reid Thompson) Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:49:55 -0500 Subject: [Nitro] question for unix wizzards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1202143795.1239.59.camel@raker.ateb.com> On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:09 +0200, George Moschovitis wrote: > Dear devs, > > 2 small unix related questions. > > does anyone know about: > > - a quick and easy way to remove duplicate lines from a text files? from http://www.student.northpark.edu/pemente/sed/sed1line.txt # delete duplicate, nonconsecutive lines from a file. Beware not to # overflow the buffer size of the hold space, or else use GNU sed. sed -n 'G; s/\n/&&/; /^\([ -~]*\n\).*\n\1/d; s/\n//; h; P' > - a quick and easy way to decide if two image (binary) files are the > same image/picture? diff will tell you if the files are different also rthompso at raker ~ $ diff 10000_Galaxies,_HST_Ultra_Deep.png Deathvalleysky_nps_big.png Files 10000_Galaxies,_HST_Ultra_Deep.png and Deathvalleysky_nps_big.png differ rthompso at raker ~ $ cp 10000_Galaxies,_HST_Ultra_Deep.png junk.png rthompso at raker ~ $ diff 10000_Galaxies,_HST_Ultra_Deep.png junk.png > > thanks in advance for your help! > > -g. > > -- > http://gmosx.me.gr > http://joy.gr > http://cull.gr > http://nitroproject.org > http://phidz.com > http://joyerz.com > _______________________________________________ > Nitro-general mailing list > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general From george.moschovitis at gmail.com Tue Feb 5 03:35:42 2008 From: george.moschovitis at gmail.com (George Moschovitis) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:35:42 +0200 Subject: [Nitro] question for unix wizzards In-Reply-To: <1202143795.1239.59.camel@raker.ateb.com> References: <1202143795.1239.59.camel@raker.ateb.com> Message-ID: Thanks for the help everyone! On Feb 4, 2008 6:49 PM, Reid Thompson wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:09 +0200, George Moschovitis wrote: > > Dear devs, > > > > 2 small unix related questions. > > > > does anyone know about: > > > > - a quick and easy way to remove duplicate lines from a text files? > from http://www.student.northpark.edu/pemente/sed/sed1line.txt > > # delete duplicate, nonconsecutive lines from a file. Beware not to > # overflow the buffer size of the hold space, or else use GNU sed. > sed -n 'G; s/\n/&&/; /^\([ -~]*\n\).*\n\1/d; s/\n//; h; P' > > > - a quick and easy way to decide if two image (binary) files are the > > same image/picture? > diff will tell you if the files are different also > > rthompso at raker ~ $ diff 10000_Galaxies,_HST_Ultra_Deep.png > Deathvalleysky_nps_big.png > Files 10000_Galaxies,_HST_Ultra_Deep.png and Deathvalleysky_nps_big.png > differ > rthompso at raker ~ $ cp 10000_Galaxies,_HST_Ultra_Deep.png junk.png > rthompso at raker ~ $ diff 10000_Galaxies,_HST_Ultra_Deep.png junk.png > > > > > > thanks in advance for your help! > > > > -g. > > > > -- > > http://gmosx.me.gr > > http://joy.gr > > http://cull.gr > > http://nitroproject.org > > http://phidz.com > > http://joyerz.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Nitro-general mailing list > > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general > _______________________________________________ > Nitro-general mailing list > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general > -- http://gmosx.me.gr http://joy.gr http://cull.gr http://nitroproject.org http://phidz.com http://joyerz.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20080205/437593ef/attachment.html From postmodern.mod3 at gmail.com Sat Feb 16 19:19:47 2008 From: postmodern.mod3 at gmail.com (postmodern modulus III) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:19:47 -0800 Subject: [Nitro] schema_inheritance in og-0.50 Message-ID: <47B77DA3.4090804@gmail.com> I was testing the most recent testing gems for og-0.50.0 but encountered the old schema_inheritance bug. class Post attr_accessor :title, String attr_accessor :body, String schema_inheritance def initialize(title,body) @title = title.to_s @body = body.to_s end end NameError: uninitialized constant Og::SchemaInheritanceBase from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/og-0.50.0/lib/og/model.rb:531:in `schema_inheritance' from (irb):25 What does the future hold for schema_inheritance? From lists at ruby-forum.com Wed Feb 20 11:18:48 2008 From: lists at ruby-forum.com (Tom Jerry) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:18:48 +0100 Subject: [Nitro] Web resources about Nitro ? Message-ID: Hi there, We are trying to gather the best tutorials and other useful web resources (hosting, showcase, community site,...) about Nitro in our web framework directory. Please don't hesitate to have a look on our "All about Nitro" http://www.therightsoft.com/products/nitro/ and send us some pointers to valuable web resources about Nitro that we may have missed to : webmaster at therightsoft.com Thanks in advance, Tom -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. From transfire at gmail.com Mon Feb 25 11:16:13 2008 From: transfire at gmail.com (Trans) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:16:13 -0500 Subject: [Nitro] First Comes Og Message-ID: <4b6f054f0802250816x2cdf1615n1faf2f6777f675cf@mail.gmail.com> Prioritizing the release of Nitro 0.50, first thing is to do is get Og in order and I'm going to do that as a fully separate package. So I'm using the Ogden repository to facilitate this. It's just a copy of the Og repo from about a month or so ago. Three things to do: 1) If any changes were made to Og darcs in the last month, please port those changes to Ogden's repo. 2) Remove use of facets/paramix.rb (its begin deprecated). This effects Orderable and Hierarchical mixins (any others?) 3) Get the tests passing. Most of them are failing, and I need people more familiar with the Og's internals to help fix. I'm not sure how much the failing tests has to do with the switch from test/unit to rspec. Who did this transition? Were the specs ever all passing? Ogden is usintg SVN and not darcs. Please see this page to check out a copy: http://rubyforge.org/scm/?group_id=5023 And let me know if you need to be added as an team developer. Thanks, T. From john at oxyliquit.de Wed Feb 27 06:38:55 2008 From: john at oxyliquit.de (Jonathan Buch) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:38:55 +0100 Subject: [Nitro] First Comes Og In-Reply-To: <4b6f054f0802250816x2cdf1615n1faf2f6777f675cf@mail.gmail.com> References: <4b6f054f0802250816x2cdf1615n1faf2f6777f675cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi, > I'm not sure how much the failing tests has to do with the switch from > test/unit to rspec. Who did this transition? Were the specs ever all > passing? I translated all of Ogs specs and some of the Nitro ones. The specs were passing about 80% as far as I can remember. As a sidenote: I resented the change to rspec, it was introduced in a hurry, was not executed by someone knowledgeable enough, did not have full backing from George and as a result is now in it's usual morbid half-state. Before the switch to rspec my mind tells me that about 3 tests failed. How about that. If you can personally assure me that the spec structure is basically working, that only `rake test` or similar has to be done and that a strict 'only patches passing all tests'-policy will be used on Ogden - then I will have a look at the failing specs. Jo -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From transfire at gmail.com Wed Feb 27 09:53:29 2008 From: transfire at gmail.com (Trans) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:53:29 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Nitro] First Comes Og In-Reply-To: References: <4b6f054f0802250816x2cdf1615n1faf2f6777f675cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <128cd30a-44b7-4e5e-935b-4be6db6e1726@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> On Feb 27, 6:38 am, "Jonathan Buch" wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm not sure how much the failing tests has to do with the switch from > > test/unit to rspec. Who did this transition? Were the specs ever all > > passing? > > I translated all of Ogs specs and some of the Nitro ones. > The specs were passing about 80% as far as I can remember. > > As a sidenote: I resented the change to rspec, it was introduced in > a hurry, was not executed by someone knowledgeable enough, did not have > full backing from George and as a result is now in it's usual morbid > half-state. I did too. Not that it was a bad idea in the long run, but it was very much wrong time to be doing it. > Before the switch to rspec my mind tells me that about 3 tests failed. > > How about that. If you can personally assure me that the spec structure > is basically working, I think so. I'm still trying to understand it myself. I assume it was correct to just load all the .rb files within the test/ directory. Since there is no spec_ prefix, or anything like that, I could only assume this to be the case. It seems to be working for the most part -- with the exception of warnings about constants being reset. I will keep working to improve this, and make sure it is working right Any help you can offer in the way of this is appreciated. > that only `rake test` or similar has to be done Yes, just run "ruby task/test". > and that a strict 'only patches passing all tests'-policy will be used > on Ogden - then I will have a look at the failing specs. Yes. After we get 0.50 out the door (which George has been asking me do for weeks now), we will switch to a proper patch policy with branches and passing tests. In fact, would you like to be in change of overseeing that? T. From john at oxyliquit.de Wed Feb 27 16:41:04 2008 From: john at oxyliquit.de (Jonathan Buch) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:41:04 +0100 Subject: [Nitro] First Comes Og In-Reply-To: <128cd30a-44b7-4e5e-935b-4be6db6e1726@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> References: <4b6f054f0802250816x2cdf1615n1faf2f6777f675cf@mail.gmail.com> <128cd30a-44b7-4e5e-935b-4be6db6e1726@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Message-ID: Hi, > I think so. I'm still trying to understand it myself. I assume it was > correct to just load all the .rb files within the test/ directory. > Since there is no spec_ prefix, or anything like that, I could only another annoyance; one gets what one asks for. :P > assume this to be the case. It seems to be working for the most part -- > with the exception of warnings about constants being reset. I will > keep working to improve this, and make sure it is working right Any > help you can offer in the way of this is appreciated. > >> that only `rake test` or similar has to be done > > Yes, just run "ruby task/test". jo:ogden jo:0$ ruby task/test ruby: No such file or directory -- task/test (LoadError) jo:ogden jo:1$ ls task/ clobber rdoc setup >> and that a strict 'only patches passing all tests'-policy will be used >> on Ogden - then I will have a look at the failing specs. > > Yes. After we get 0.50 out the door (which George has been asking me > do for weeks now), we will switch to a proper patch policy with > branches and passing tests. But of course, until there is actually a Ogden which has no failing tests, that point is moot. But I like the plan. :) > In fact, would you like to be in change of overseeing that? No, I don't see that coming yet. As I'm wrapping up my University time this semester, I very much doubt I have the leasure time to do maintainer work. All I hope I can do is putting my Og knowledge to use to at least get it in a half stable state. Jo -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From transfire at gmail.com Wed Feb 27 17:13:22 2008 From: transfire at gmail.com (Trans) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:13:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Nitro] First Comes Og In-Reply-To: References: <4b6f054f0802250816x2cdf1615n1faf2f6777f675cf@mail.gmail.com> <128cd30a-44b7-4e5e-935b-4be6db6e1726@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <7f44c329-63d6-471d-a291-c3751f1fb59b@o77g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> On Feb 27, 4:41 pm, "Jonathan Buch" wrote: > Hi, > > > I think so. I'm still trying to understand it myself. I assume it was > > correct to just load all the .rb files within the test/ directory. > > Since there is no spec_ prefix, or anything like that, I could only > > another annoyance; one gets what one asks for. :P :D If it's any consolation I'll buy a beer (or preferred beverage). > > assume this to be the case. It seems to be working for the most part -- > > with the exception of warnings about constants being reset. I will > > keep working to improve this, and make sure it is working right Any > > help you can offer in the way of this is appreciated. > > >> that only `rake test` or similar has to be done > > > Yes, just run "ruby task/test". > > jo:ogden jo:0$ ruby task/test > ruby: No such file or directory -- task/test (LoadError) > jo:ogden jo:1$ ls task/ > clobber rdoc setup Sorry. I worked on these last night and forgot to check them in. They should be there now. > >> and that a strict 'only patches passing all tests'-policy will be used > >> on Ogden - then I will have a look at the failing specs. > > > Yes. After we get 0.50 out the door (which George has been asking me > > do for weeks now), we will switch to a proper patch policy with > > branches and passing tests. > > But of course, until there is actually a Ogden which has no failing > tests, that point is moot. But I like the plan. :) > > > In fact, would you like to be in change of overseeing that? > > No, I don't see that coming yet. As I'm wrapping up my University > time this semester, I very much doubt I have the leasure time to > do maintainer work. > All I hope I can do is putting my Og knowledge to use to at least get > it in a half stable state. Understood. Hopefully a couple of other interested and capable programmers will turn up once we get 0.50 out the door. I'm pretty busy too. T.