[Nitro] nothing like a deadline...

postmodern modulus III postmodern.mod3 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 23 21:35:24 EDT 2008


Mark V wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Bill Kelly <billk at cts.com> wrote:
>   
>>  From: "Trans" <transfire at gmail.com>
>>
>>     
>>  > It seems everyone is pretty well satisfied to turn to alternatives. I
>>  > guess shouldn't bother to continue work on Nitro or Og, then?
>>
>>     
>
> I have moved on to Sequel, and some devs on DataMapper had indicated
> they have an Og 'style' in mind for somethings.
> However I haven't delved into the DM source.
>
> Cheers
> Mark
>
>   
>>  Hmm...
>>
>>  Are folks abandoning Og, too?  I notice the Ramaze page about
>>  ORM's shows an example using Og, but that they "suggest Sequel."
>>
>>  http://ramaze.net/features:orms
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Regards,
>>
>>  Bill
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Nitro-general mailing list
>>  Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
>>  http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
>
>   
I recently moved one of my projects from Og to DataMapper. While 
DataMapper is definitely Og-like, it doesn't quite feel as dynamic as 
Og. I also miss the schema-evolution of Og.


More information about the Nitro-general mailing list