[Nitro] RFC: Basic Points for a Better Nitro/Og
dan at tastapod.com
Fri Sep 21 06:49:42 EDT 2007
Mercurial is very "hackable", partly because it's written in python (is
that heresy on the nitro list?) and partly because the developers have
designed in some very useful extension points.
There's an extension called record
supports darcs-style cherry picking at commit time. Another called
transplant does the same between repositories. So it's not baked in but
it's not difficult.
I'm only advocating it as a happy user - I have no other association
with mercurial, and I was using darcs for a while myself. I just find I
prefer mercurial for a bunch of weird intangible reasons.
gabriele renzi wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:33:25 +0200, Dan North wrote:
>> If you are thinking about moving away from darcs, can I re-raise my
>> suggestion of moving to mercurial? It's written in python so it's
>> available on pretty much any platform, and it allows the kind of
>> distributed, patch-based development model we're used to with darcs.
> ot, but, since I never quite understood this: does mercurial do dependency
> tracking & cherry picking like darcs, or differently, or it does'nt even
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nitro-general