[Nitro] porting from 0.41 to 0.5

George Moschovitis george.moschovitis at gmail.com
Wed Sep 12 10:10:09 EDT 2007

Ok, I will fix this like this:

nitro will try to extract a filename, if is is not 'registered' it will just
use the string as a param.

everyone finds this logical?


On 9/12/07, Jonathan Buch <john at oxyliquit.de> wrote:
> Hi,
> > Hmm, there is a problem with the '.' in the uri parameter...
> > I cant see an easy way to fix this.
> >
> > anyone has any idea?
> can I say that I find this to be an extremely bad idea?
> I think we had this discussion before, when Nitro regarded
> all URLs with a dot in it as Files (instead of normal Nitro
> actions).  As I said before, this is an extremely bad idea.
> The way I discovered this before is with Oxywtf and Tags.
>   /tag/Nitro/0.49
> Which clearly should be allowed, no?  But this is quite
> contrary to your current 'scheme'.
> What about configuration?  "Use auto-file-type discovering"
> That or a definitive list of used file types.  But, I always
> fear that this would lead to inconsistencies, depending on
> user input (which a URL is) is quite an icky topic to handle.
> Jo
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
> _______________________________________________
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20070912/c68e4a7c/attachment.html 

More information about the Nitro-general mailing list