[Nitro] Og store vs sql over-ride methods

George Moschovitis george.moschovitis at gmail.com
Wed Sep 12 03:36:30 EDT 2007


I think transaction support is not SQL exclusive. It is a n ACID requirement
for every kind of store.

-g.

On 9/12/07, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Is my understanding correct?:
>
> Methods def'd but 'Not implemented' in 'store.rb', should or must (?)
> be implemented by one of its subclasses.  There can be many stores,
> and SQL is one (popular) type.
>
> Methods def'd 'Not implemented' in 'sql.rb', should or must (?) be
> implemented by one of its subclasses.
>
> If this is right shouldn't the transaction related methods in
> 'store.rb' rather be in 'sql.rb'?
>
> Pedantic, and not fatal, I know but I'm trying to get a handle on what
> Og considers an SQL adapter should or must(?) implement - to my mind
> sql.rb should contain that info...
> Comments?
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
>



-- 
http://www.me.gr
http://phidz.com
http://blog.gmosx.com
http://cull.gr
http://www.joy.gr
http://nitroproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20070912/e50ba126/attachment.html 


More information about the Nitro-general mailing list