[Nitro] Og store vs sql over-ride methods
george.moschovitis at gmail.com
Wed Sep 12 03:36:30 EDT 2007
I think transaction support is not SQL exclusive. It is a n ACID requirement
for every kind of store.
On 9/12/07, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is my understanding correct?:
> Methods def'd but 'Not implemented' in 'store.rb', should or must (?)
> be implemented by one of its subclasses. There can be many stores,
> and SQL is one (popular) type.
> Methods def'd 'Not implemented' in 'sql.rb', should or must (?) be
> implemented by one of its subclasses.
> If this is right shouldn't the transaction related methods in
> 'store.rb' rather be in 'sql.rb'?
> Pedantic, and not fatal, I know but I'm trying to get a handle on what
> Og considers an SQL adapter should or must(?) implement - to my mind
> sql.rb should contain that info...
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nitro-general