[Nitro] Nitro/OG spec convention/organization questions
Mark Van De Vyver
mvyver at gmail.com
Sat Sep 1 21:21:47 EDT 2007
On 9/2/07, Arne Brasseur <arne at arnebrasseur.net> wrote:
> Mark Van De Vyver schreef:
> > Hi,
> > I've questions about spec best practice and organization of specs in
> > nitro/og. Please don't consider any of this critical - I'm just
> > talking about superficial issues, not the content of the current
> > written spec files.
> Both structure and content can (IMHO) be improved upon. Before recently
> Nitro/Og used Test::Unit. There was decided (before I came here) to
> convert everything to RSpec. This conversion had been slacking for a
> long time. I implemented the rake tasks to run the specs, with the
> actual test runners taken from Ramaze. It was by no means perfect, but
> Good Enough to get things going again and put a bit more emphasis on the
> I did most of the syntax-level conversion from Test::Unit to RSpec, with
> Jo making sure the tests pass. The last time I checked there were still
> several incomplete or failing tests.
Thanks for effort you guys put in and the background is good to know.
> > ...
> > Next, should spec files correspond to the file name containing the
> > code they spec, or the class/module name? If you think the file name,
> > then what should be done with directory structures? Or should there be
> > no such ties that bind?
> > A directory structure might look like:
> > ./spec
> > ./spec/benchmarks
> > ./spec/developer
> > ./spec/examples
> > ./spec/fixtures
> > ./spec/models
> > The fixtures and models dir's could be sub dir's of
> > ./spec/support/
> > Or, should we 'just do it' and merge/cull/re-organize later? I think
> > can hear some people groaning :)
> Actually I'm glad you bring this up. The rule of thumb I applied was to
> largely mirror the lib/<project> dir in spec, so one spec file with the
> same name and relative location for every source file. This was not
> considered stringent. This leaves the question open where to put support
Ok, sound like there is some flux and some things are settled.
> My idea was to
> - convert everything
> - make tests go green
> - improve on content and structure
> However George seems to have some great plans with the specs, with the
> hidden directories and all of that, so I'm waiting to see what happens.
> He told me three weeks ago the tests would be moved back ASAP. I also
> moved to the other side of the world this week, so I haven't really
> looked at it much lately.
> I hope this answers some of your questions. George, could you please let
> us in on what you have in mind regarding the tests/specs?
Thanks, you definitely answered some questions. I'll wait to hear
from George on hwo to structure things, if they are to be structured
> Arne Brasseur
> arne at arnebrasseur.net
More information about the Nitro-general