[Nitro] Og [RFC]: More jargon...
Mark Van De Vyver
mvyver at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 06:31:52 EDT 2007
On 10/7/07, George Moschovitis <george.moschovitis at gmail.com> wrote:
> > IMHO they certainly don't write or read, it's debatable that some
> in lisp literature reading == parsing. In this point of view read is a valid
> I chose them because read has the same stringlength with write and makes
> the source code nicer ;-)
> but as I said, I fully agree with you that naming consistency is important.
Currently we have methods named:
Are any of the following name pairs preferred?:
More information about the Nitro-general