[Nitro] [OG] enchant Question: klass.table or klass::OGTABLE
Mark Van De Vyver
mvyver at gmail.com
Thu Nov 29 04:21:10 EST 2007
On Nov 29, 2007 11:49 AM, Judson Lester <nyarly at gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking back at that comment, I believe what I meant was that, rather than
> use OGTABLE, and assign it based on the klass, instead, just use
> klass.table(), and be sure that klass.table for SchemaInheritence works. In
> general, it was my thinking at the time that klass.table should be the
> correct way to determine the table name, although in a perfect world, client
Thanks for the insight, that is useful.
> code wouldn't ever need to, except in unusual circumstances - like migrating
> out of Og, or trying to understand the library better.
> Looking at the code now, later, I can't find Og::SchemaInheritenceBase at
> all. Has STI been abandoned?
would be good to have an issue tracker...
Anyway, for the record, the following spec requires a flexmock and why
might be worth thinking about?
I'm cheating a little by not doing a full blown Og.start -
DummyDatabase is a sub-class of DbiAdapter, with some methods
overridden to allow me to see the sql statements generated.
describe DbiAdapter, "#table_exists?" do
@db = DummyDatabase.new
it "should use Database#tables if available" do
> On Nov 7, 2007 12:00 AM, Mark Van De Vyver < mvyver at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Devs,
> > This may be a dumb question, but which of the following is the correct
> > way to access the table name of an Og managed class:
> > a) klass.table
> > b) klass::OGTABLE
> > In fact just what does the following comment in
> > sql.rb:SqlStore#enchant mean/relate to?
> > # FIXME: jl: Remove references to table, then remove these 5 lines
> > It makes me think the above choice it's been resolved to use
> > klass::OGTABLE, _but_ _only_ in Og's code. Correct?
> > So internal use of klass.table is deprecated but the table attribute
> > remains for user code. Correct?
> > Mark
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nitro-general mailing list
> > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
> Your subnet is currently 169.254.0.0/16. You are likely to be eaten by a
More information about the Nitro-general