[Nitro] A Q about the 0.50 branch plans
Mark Van De Vyver
mvyver at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 03:31:13 EST 2007
On Nov 21, 2007 7:07 PM, George Moschovitis
<george.moschovitis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you handle this one? :)
> On Nov 21, 2007 4:41 AM, Trans <transfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 8:04 am, Trans <transf... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 20, 3:31 am, "George Moschovitis"
> > >
> > > < george.moschovi... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I am thinking about dumping the old history to doc/CHANGELOG and using
> > > > branch repo as the new repo.
> > >
> > > Let take this as the opportunity to move Og into it's own repo. We can
> > > then tag the current version and create a branch for Mark to apply his
> > > changes. If the changes look good and test out we can merge back to
> > > Og's trunk.
> > Actually, to clarify this. I deem it necessary simply b/c (as far as
> > can tell) darcs only allows for the single "bundle" space. With SVN
> > you can work on any portion of a directory structure independently of
> > the rest.
Ok, sounds good. This can wait until after 0.50 is out the door.
Thanks again for all the effort you guys are putting in.
> > T.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nitro-general mailing list
> > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
More information about the Nitro-general