[Nitro] A Q about the 0.50 branch plans

George Moschovitis george.moschovitis at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 03:07:04 EST 2007


Can you handle this one? :)

-g.

On Nov 21, 2007 4:41 AM, Trans <transfire at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Nov 20, 8:04 am, Trans <transf... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 3:31 am, "George Moschovitis"
> >
> > <george.moschovi... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I am thinking about dumping the old history to doc/CHANGELOG and using
> the
> > > branch repo as the new repo.
> >
> > Let take this as the opportunity to move Og into it's own repo. We can
> > then tag the current version and create a branch for Mark to apply his
> > changes. If the changes look good and test out we can merge back to
> > Og's trunk.
>
> Actually, to clarify this. I deem it necessary simply b/c (as far as
> can tell) darcs only allows for the single "bundle" space. With SVN
> you can work on any portion of a directory structure independently of
> the rest.
>
> T.
> _______________________________________________
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
>



-- 
http://me.gr
http://joy.gr
http://cull.gr
http://nitroproject.org
http://phidz.com
http://joyerz.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20071121/10a4ea41/attachment.html 


More information about the Nitro-general mailing list