[Nitro] [Og] Og with Sequel

Trans transfire at gmail.com
Fri Nov 2 18:11:19 EDT 2007



On Nov 1, 6:46 pm, "Mark Van De Vyver" <mvy... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm still in the process of working on a DBI adapter.
> One thing I'm currently working on is trying to leverage off Sequel's
> "non-Model" code.
> Primarily to get to the Sequel::Dataset functionality and any other
> useful features I come across along the way.
> I've contact Sharon Rosen and she seemed more than happy to have
> Sequel used in more contexts.
>
> I'm working my way through trying to get Sequel specs working, and
> well as trying to implement  some of the other changes/issues
> discussed on this list (mainly the lower level method naming - which
> turns out to be fortuitous because otherwise there would have been
> some name clashes with Sequel).
> I'm making notes and would hope to get to a point where the relevant
> sequel modules/classes can be dropped into Og with as little effort as
> possible.
>
> At the moment I'm keeping as much of the changes in the
> "./adapter/dbi" area as possible.
> Naturally some things are starting to 'leak' out, mainly related to
> options handling and this I had to do to be able to write some focused
> specs.
>
> Anyway, I suppose I'm asking for some feedback on:
> Does this idea (Og+ Sequel) resonate with the community?

I'm not sure I understand. But I may misunderstand Sequel. Aren't
Sequel and Og two different approaches to the same task? How can they
work together? If you are creating a DBI adapter, what does Sequel
have to do with that?

T.



More information about the Nitro-general mailing list