[Nitro] class_extension

[George Moschovitis]

> Moreover, do you understand the technical
> differences between the two? Do you realize that the first does not
> extend past the first inclusion? Ie. include Foo above into Bar and
> then Bar into Baz, Baz would not have the module methods --for that
> you'd have to add even more crufty code.

Hmm, I didn't know about that. I thought (and othere agree) that the
standard idiom is more readable. But if your code works better (and
safer) as you describe, I guess we should reconsider, and keep using
this. Thanks for clearing this out.

regards,
George.

-- 
http://blog.gmosx.com
http://cull.gr
http://www.joy.gr
http://nitroproject.org