[Nitro] script/ vs helper/ vs script/helper
george.moschovitis at gmail.com
Sat Jun 23 02:44:23 EDT 2007
arne, I like Tom's proposal! script/lib sounds great to me. What do you
On 6/23/07, Trans <transfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2:53 pm, Arne Brasseur <a... at arnebrasseur.net> wrote:
> > Dear devs,
> > It's been a bit busy over here but I see Jo and G have been doing nice
> > stuff, way to go!
> > I would like to propose some more source tree layout changes, let me
> > elaborate:
> > the script/ dir currently looks like this
> > script/repl.rb
> > script/glycerin.rb
> > script/helper/spec.rb
> > script/helper/layout.rb
> > script/helper/wrap.rb
> Hmm... I would think script/lib would be a better name, since that's
> what they are --reusable libraries for build scripts.
> > Layout and wrap are used for the specs, and I can imagine other spec
> > helpers appearing. So why not move layout and wrap to a spec subdir,
> > helper/glycerin.rb
> > helper/spec.rb
> > helper/spec/layout.rb
> > helper/spec/wrap.rb
> Nothing wrong with
> if you really feel it necessary to have another striation. But I
> wouldn't bother unless you have 3 or 4+ spec helpers.
> my 2c.
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nitro-general