[Nitro] Dir structure

[George Moschovitis]

Ok,

point taken, but I would like to keep Og simpler. There are so many
things that could be implemented as mixins I don't want to include
everything in the default distribution. I will think about this a bit
more. I will most probably keep an Og namespace for mixins as you
suggest.

regards,
George.



On 2/27/07, Judson Lester <nyarly at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/27/07, George Moschovitis <george.moschovitis at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But does really Taggable or Orderable belong to Og?
> >
>
> Well, looking at mixin/taggable.rb and mixin/orderable.rb, yes.  I
> don't see any references to anything actually web related in either,
> and neither make any sense without Og.
>
> Give an example: I've got a library I've been working on, not ready
> for limelight yet, that builds CLIs.  I've written an app that uses
> that and Og to manage some personal databases.  It makes perfect sense
> to me to use Taggable for that sort of application.  But I can't
> imagine building a Nitro app with Taggable but not Og.  (Although it's
> a stretch to picture Nitro without Og in the first place.)
>
> Judson
> _______________________________________________
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
>


-- 
http://blog.gmosx.com
http://cull.gr
http://www.joy.gr
http://nitroproject.org