[Nitro] Og, adapting postgresql to reorgnaization
nyarly at gmail.com
Fri Feb 23 14:28:37 EST 2007
It shouldn't be too hard. I'm in the midst of a patch, but when I get
it done, I'll tweak that in.
On 2/22/07, Jonathan Buch <john at oxyliquit.de> wrote:
> >> I'm not sure we can make MySQL thread safe (as I think the standard table
> >> type doesn't react on 'transaction' anyway). Maybe we put a ruby-level
> >> synchronized around that part?
> > Trouble is, when you have a db involved, process level locks aren't
> > really enough. Slows down execution without real benefit. This is why
> > MySQL's eternal claim that transactions were unnecessary has always
> > galled me.
> I read this as: "Lets just leave mysql and it's users alone" ;D
> Allright, I would be happy if you could find a way to make changes so we
> get the old behaviour for psql again, making psql the 'premier' choice
> again. ;)
> Feel the love
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
More information about the Nitro-general