[Nitro] Og, adapting postgresql to reorgnaization

Judson Lester nyarly at gmail.com
Thu Feb 22 14:29:38 EST 2007

On 2/22/07, Jonathan Buch <john at oxyliquit.de> wrote:

> I'm not sure we can make MySQL thread safe (as I think the standard table
> type doesn't react on 'transaction' anyway).  Maybe we put a ruby-level
> synchronized around that part?

Trouble is, when you have a db involved, process level locks aren't
really enough. Slows down execution without real benefit.  This is why
MySQL's eternal claim that transactions were unnecessary has always
galled me.


More information about the Nitro-general mailing list