[Nitro] Og, adapting postgresql to reorgnaization
Judson Lester
nyarly at gmail.com
Thu Feb 22 14:29:38 EST 2007
On 2/22/07, Jonathan Buch <john at oxyliquit.de> wrote:
> I'm not sure we can make MySQL thread safe (as I think the standard table
> type doesn't react on 'transaction' anyway). Maybe we put a ruby-level
> synchronized around that part?
Trouble is, when you have a db involved, process level locks aren't
really enough. Slows down execution without real benefit. This is why
MySQL's eternal claim that transactions were unnecessary has always
galled me.
Judson
More information about the Nitro-general
mailing list