[Nitro] Annotation, validation
george.moschovitis at gmail.com
Mon Feb 12 18:15:23 EST 2007
Btw, I am not working on Og at the moment (other than applying some patches
from Jud) so Og patches are accepted ;-) And I am expecting some
builder-related patches from Tom.
I will probably push some stuff to the repo tomorrow. Be warned, this will
> break almost everything, but it will give the chance to anyone interested to
> comment on the latest changes and offer valuable suggestions.
> On 2/13/07, Jonathan Buch <john at oxyliquit.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:36:03 +0100, Judson Lester <nyarly at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On 2/10/07, Jonathan Buch <john at oxyliquit.de> wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >> this could be done, but as you said, it would create overhead. For a
> > >> uniqe check, one database roundtrip is required. Depending on how
> > fast
> > >> you insert data this will kill performance.
> > >>
> > >> I vote for making this 'auto validator generator' despite this.
> > >
> > > Maybe a setting for Og along the lines of "validation_at_store" or
> > > something is in order before changing behavior then?
> > Yeah, I'd like it to be an option... But G is revamping whole Nitro
> > atm,
> > lets see how the configuration turns out.
> > G: reminder to send me nitro overview scan, and please think of how to
> > use Og with these new settings (if done at all if I understood you
> > correctly).
> > Yeah, config would be better, one can then switch it off when the system
> > gets too slow witout changing a line of the implementation...
> > Jo
> > --
> > Feel the love
> > http://pinkjuice.com/pics/ruby.png
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nitro-general mailing list
> > Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nitro-general