[Nitro] Nitro leaking?
john at oxyliquit.de
Tue Sep 5 14:20:40 EDT 2006
what started as the question of some benchmarks, showing if Rails or Nitro
is faster in rendering a simple app, I guess we found quite some leak.
Rails benchmark on which the Nitro test is modelled from:
[19:58] <wyhaines> I just did a fresh install of nitro via gem install,
then ran the code snippet that you sent to me. Process size grows quite a
lot with every 10000 requests I push through it.
[19:58] <wyhaines> On both Ruby 1.8.4 and 1.8.5.
[20:04] <Vagabond> might be something to toss the mailing list's way
[20:04] <Vagabond> how much are we talking here BTW?
[20:05] <wyhaines> Process size, for what it's worth, was close to 30Mb
after 10k requests.
[20:05] <wyhaines> Eh, I closed the window, but I think it was about 60Mb
after 30k requests.
[20:06] <Vagabond> ugh, yeah that's not good
[20:08] <Kashia> heavy :)
[20:13] <wyhaines> And, for what it's worth, I was running this on a
version of Ruby patched to fix the leak in Hash that I found at the end of
[20:14] <wyhaines> And it was running with a modified Mutex, too, that
eliminates the potentially troublesome interaction with array.c's internal
memory management, so it's not related to that, either.
[20:14] <wyhaines> And the leak was about the same in both webrick and
PS: As consolation, Nitro was found to be way faster.. :P
Feel the love
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1666 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20060905/82b19082/attachment.zip
More information about the Nitro-general