[Nitro] Serious discussion on Annotaitons - Part II

transfire at gmail.com transfire at gmail.com
Fri Nov 3 07:42:55 EST 2006

George Moschovitis wrote:
> >    harp:~ > cat a.rb
> > ...
> > :baz}
> >
> > Now this implementatin leaves out some of the needed shortcuts (like
> > implied class annotation) and it also leaves out the BIG issue of
> > inheritance, but those can of course can be worked in. The main thing
> > here is the simplicty of the interface. I realize it's a big change but
> > I think Ara has a point. The simplicy, uniformity and consistancy has
> > it's own merits over the elegance of the magic dot notation.
> Well I like this  simplicity as well. Could you introduce the
> inheritance feature?
> And what is implied class annotation?

Oh, just:

  ann :x, String


  ann :x, :class=>String

More information about the Nitro-general mailing list