[Nitro] [OT] Roll n' Rain
aidan at yoyo.org
Wed Jun 28 10:33:23 EDT 2006
I really think you need to rename Rain to Rock. Having a package
management duo called Rock and Roll is too good and opportunity to
I'm sorry I didn't get time to help you with this - I know we talked
about it a bit. I think you implemented something very different to
what I had in mind, but still it's cool to see something to challenge
(the frankly awful) gems.
My favourite package management system is the ports system used by
FreeBSD. This allows a combination of binary packages and source
file compilations to be used interchangeably. I wanted to create
something similar to that, which would handle arbitrarily
installation of ruby stuff (as long as the package defined a way to
'make' itself and a way to define dependencies). I'll probably still
have a go at doing this (should it be called Rorts? (http://
www.allwords.com/word-rort.html) :-) ).
Anyway, cool stuff T. I've not had a chance to actually play with
the code (t - 3 days to beta for SyncBridge) but will soon.
On 28/06/2006, at 8:18 AM, itsme213 wrote:
> Wow. Sounds too good to be true. Any downside at all you can think of?
> May be good to put up a web page with stuff like rationale,
> advantages, smooth co-existence and transition, examples, some
> etc. before announcing to other ruby lists.
> Take 'em by surprise :-)
> "TRANS" <transfire at gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4b6f054f0606271846u3e6829b5me68679593cf4de30 at mail.gmail.com...
>> On 6/27/06, James Britt <james.britt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Does it play well with gems? For example, is it plausible that Roll
>>> could create and install a gem package as it might a .rpm or .deb
>> Oops. I forgot to mention. Yes, it already can create Gems too. The
>> code actually came right out of Reap's package task.
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
More information about the Nitro-general